References

Alejandro A. Reflexive discourse analysis: a methodology for the practice of reflexivity. Eur J Int Relat. 2021; 27:(1)150-174 https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120969789

Bell L, Lewis-Brooke S, Herring R, Lehane L, O'Farrell-Pearce S. Mothers' voices: hearing and assessing the contributions of ‘birth mothers’ to the development of social work interventions and family support. Br J Soc Work. 2021; 51:(6)2019-2037 https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa138

Bolderston A. Conducting a research interview. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2012; 43:(1)66-76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002

Boşnak B. Semi-structured interviews in civil society studies: notes from the field. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2022; 51:239-255 https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1116964

Day HLS. Exploring online peer support groups for adults experiencing long COVID in the United Kingdom: qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24:(5) https://doi.org/10.2196/37674

Denny E, Weckesser A. Qualitative research: what it is and what it is not. BJOG. 2018; 126:(3) https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15198

Elliott H. Interviewing mothers: reflections on closeness and reflexivity in research encounters. Stud Matern. 2011; 3:(1)1-20 https://doi.org/10.16995/sim.71

Fuchs A, Möhler E, Reck C, Resch F, Kaess M. The early mother-to-child bond and its unique prospective contribution to child behavior evaluated by mothers and teachers. Psychopathology. 2016; 49:(4)211-216 https://doi.org/10.1159/000445439

Gilkerson L, Burkhardt T, Katch LE, Hans SL. Increasing parenting self-efficacy: the fussy baby network® intervention. Infant Ment Health J. 2020; 41:(2)232-245 https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21836

James N, Busher H. Credibility, authenticity and voice: dilemmas in online interviewing. Qual Res. 2006; 6:(3)403-420 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106065010

Janghorban R, Roudsari RL, Taghipour A. Skype interviewing: the new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. Int J Qual Stud Health Wellbeing. 2014; 9:(1) https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152

Kostovicova D, Knott E. Harm, change and unpredictability: the ethics of interviews in conflict research. Qual Res. 2022; 22:(1)56-73 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120975657

Kuhnke JL, Keast D, Rosenthal S, Evans RJ. Health professionals' perspectives on delivering patient-focused wound management: a qualitative study. J Wound Care. 2019; 28:(Sup7)S4-S13 https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup7.S4

Lambert C, Jomeen J, McSherry W. Reflexivity: a review of the literature in the context of midwifery research. Br J Midwifery. 2010; 18:(5)321-326 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2010.18.5.47872

Magaldi D, Berler MLondon: Springer; 2020

Markham AN Representation in online ethnographies: a matter of context sensitivity. In: Chen S, Hall J, Johns M New York: Peter Lang Publishers; 2003

Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2022; 45:(3)1-11 https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

Palmer S, Bridgeman K, Di Pierro I, Jones R, Phillips C, Wilson M. The views of people with joint hypermobility syndrome on its impact, management and the use of patient-reported outcome measures. A thematic analysis of open-ended questionnaire responses. Musculoskelet Care. 2019; 17:(2)183-193 https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1387

Peters K, Halcomb E. Interviews in qualitative research. Nurse Res. 2015; 22:(4)6-7 https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.6.s2

Reay D Future directions in diff erence research: recognising and responding to diff erence in the research process. In: Hesse-Biber SN London: SAGE Publications; 2012

Sah L, Singh DR, Sah RK. Conducting qualitative interviews using virtual communication tools amid COVID-19 pandemic: a learning opportunity for future research. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020; 58:(232)1103-1106 https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5738

Samuk Carignani Ş, Burchi S. Preparing for online interviews during COVID-19: the intricacies of technology and online human interaction. SN Social Sciences. 2022; 2:(10) https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00498-2

Sang KJC, James N, Busher H. Online interviewing. Qual Res Psychol. 2013; 10:(2)217-218 https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.578537

Sizoo EM, Monnier AA, Bloemen M, Hertogh CM, Smalbrugge M. Dilemmas with restrictive visiting policies in Dutch nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis of an open-ended questionnaire with elderly care physicians. J Am Med Direct Ass. 2020; 21:(12)1774-1781

Wain A. Learning through reflection. Br J Midwifery. 2017; 25:(10)662-666 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2017.25.10.662

The importance of reflexivity in data collection methods for qualitative midwifery research

02 December 2023
Volume 31 · Issue 12

Abstract

Interviews remain a crucial component of data collection for qualitative studies. Semi-structured interviews, in which the researcher asks preset questions and follows up while the subject responds, can reveal a participant's experiences, beliefs and opinions. Unfortunately, as qualitative researchers, it can be challenging to collect data when a mother and infant require flexible hours, rather than defined. This paper aims to explore a midwife's reflections on the difficulties of collecting data in qualitative research with mothers of very young babies. It will also discuss some important considerations before conducting interviews among mothers with young babies. Timing considerations and internet connections must be prepared properly. Through early identification of alternate solutions for potential difficulties that may arise throughout the data collection process, such reflexivity can influence future planning of effective data gathering.

Qualitative research offers valuable insights into people's experiences, yet a definitive, universally accepted definition of this methodology remains elusive. It encompasses diverse theoretical and methodological approaches, representing both a perspective and a mode of inquiry (Denny and Weckesser, 2018). In qualitative studies, interviews stand as a pivotal tool for data collection. Semi-structured interviews, characterised by researchers posing predetermined questions or topics and subsequently engaging in follow-up discussions with subjects, have the potential to yield profound insights into subjects’ experiences, beliefs and opinions (Peters and Halcomb, 2015).

In the context of nursing and midwifery, it is important to comprehend the intricate behaviours and individual attributes exhibited during interviews for data collection. This understanding is vital, acknowledging the broad scope of the discipline. Researchers must comprehend how mothers engage in interviews, as it allows them to reflect on their personal experiences and biases, thereby illuminating their reflexive presence in research interactions (Elliott, 2011). By exploring the voices and perspectives of mothers themselves, it is possible to attain a comprehensive understanding of their experiences and needs (Bell et al, 2021).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month