References

Davis-Floyd R. Birth as an American rite of passage..Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992

Donnison J. Midwives and medical men: a history of inter-professional rivalries and women's rights..: Schocken; 1977

Duffin L. The conspicuous consumptive: woman as an invalid.. In: Delamont S, Duffin L (eds). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2012

Ehrenreich B, English D. Witches, midwives and nurses: a history of women healers., 2nd ed. : The Feminist Press Cuny; 2010

Harley D. Provincial midwives in England: Lancashire and Cheshire, 1660–1760.. In: Marland H (ed). London: Routledge; 1993

Katz-Rothman B. In Labour: Women and Power in the Birth Place..London: Junction Books; 1982

Kessler D, Summerton N, Graham J. Effects of the medical liability system in Australia, the UK and the USA.. The Lancet. 2006; 368:(9531)240-246

Lawrence-Beech B, Phipps B. Normal birth: women's stories.. In: Downe S (ed). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2008

Maternal Health: An Executive Summary for the Lancet's Series.. 2016. https://www.thelancet.com/pb/assets/raw/Lancet/stories/series/maternal-health-2016/mathealth2016-exec-summ.pdf (accessed 12 November 2020)

Murphy-Lawless J. Reading Birth and Death: A History of Obstetric Thinking..Ireland: Cork University Press; 1998

Oakley A. “Who Cares for Women? Science Versus Love in Midwifery Today.”. Midwives Chronicle. 1989; 102:(1218)214-221

Wagner M. Born in the USA: how a broken maternity system must be fixed to put women and children first..: University of California Press; 2006

Feminism, midwifery and the medicalisation of birth

02 December 2020
Volume 28 · Issue 12
 Women were believed to be lesser in intellect than men, and were thus excluded from practising science and medicine professionally
Women were believed to be lesser in intellect than men, and were thus excluded from practising science and medicine professionally

Abstract

Dr Clare Davison examines the perception of women and midwifery through ages

Historically, childbirth was the domain of women only, for it was regarded as a female mystery, of which women alone had special knowledge and understanding. From the 1700s, with the rise of science and what was considered the more ‘modern’ and rational approach to midwifery theory, the old midwifery ‘ways of knowing’ were dismissed as superstitions and old wives' tales. The medical profession mostly consisted of men and they accused midwives of using ancient, dangerous and outdated practices.

In the 18th century in the Western world, the men in the medical profession, such as Fielding Ould in Ireland and William Smellie in Scotland, were gaining respect and developing new birthing theories that were based on the science, anatomy and technical knowledge (Murphy-Lawless, 1998). One of the most significant aspects of the new medical ‘science’, was the belief that the body operated like a machine. Within this discourse, childbirth was understood as a mechanical process.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month