References

Baergen RN Pathology of the umbilical cord. In: Benirschke K, Kaufmann P, Baergen RN (eds). New York, New York: Springfield; 2005

Baergen R Umbilical cord pathology. In: Baergen R Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2013

de Laat MWM, Franx A, Bots ML, Visser GHA, Nikkels PGJ Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107:1049-1055 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000209197.84185.15

de Laat MWM, van der Meij JJC, Visser GHA, Franx A, Nikkels PGJ Hypercoiling of the umbilical cord and placental maturation defect: associated pathology?. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2007; 10:(4)293-299 https://doi.org/10.2350/06-01-0015.1

Di Naro E, Raio L, Cromi A, Giocolano A Sonographic assessment of the umbilical cord. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 6:66-75 https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1227

Ebbing C, Johnsen SL, Albrechtsen S, Sunde ID, Vekseth C, Rasmussen S Velamentous or marginal cord insertion and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth, prelabor rupture of the membranes, and anomalous cord length, a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96:(1)78-85 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13035

Ebbing C, Kessler J, Moster D, Rasmussen S Isolated single umbilical artery and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome and third stage of labor complications: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99:(3)374-380 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13747

Ferguson VL, Dodson RB Bioengineering aspects of the umbilical cord. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009; 144:S108-S113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.024

Gilbert-Barness E, Drut RM, Drut R, Grange DK, Opitz JM Developmental abnormalities resulting in short umbilical cord. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1993; 29:(1)113-140

González Manzanilla L, Viña MI, González U, Sanoja R, Paiva S Funiculi furcata: una rara anomalía del cordón umbilical. Gac méd Caracas. 1996; 150-154

Goynumer G, Ozdemir A, Wetherilt L, Durukan B, Yayla M Umbilical cord thickness in the first and early second trimesters and perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med. 2008; 36:(6)523-526 https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2008.087

Hall M, Valencia CM, Soma-Pillay P Effective and simple interventions to improve outcomes for preterm infants worldwide: the FIGO PremPrep-5 initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024; 165:(3)929-935 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15269

Hammad IA, Blue NR, Allshouse AA Umbilical cord abnormalities and stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135:(3)644-652 https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003676

Hasegawa J, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K, Sekizawa A, Okai T Velamentous cord insertion: significance of prenatal detection to predict perinatal complications. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 45:(1)21-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1028-4559(09)60185-6

Hayes DJL, Warland J, Parast MM Umbilical cord characteristics and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020; 15:(9) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239630

Kaplan C Umbilical cord. In: Kaplan C (ed). New York: Springer; 2007

Leon RL, Mir IN, Herrera CL Neuroplacentology in congenital heart disease: placental connections to neurodevelopmental outcomes. Pediatr Res. 2022; 91:(4)787-794 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01521-7

Linde LE, Rasmussen S, Kessler J, Ebbing C Extreme umbilical cord lengths, cord knot and entanglement: risk factors and risk of adverse outcomes, a population-based study. PLoS One. 2018; 13:(3) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194814

Martín de Llano JJ, Fuertes G, Torró I, García Vicent C, Fayos JL, Lurbe E Birth weight and characteristics of endothelial and smooth muscle cell cultures from human umbilical cord vessels. J Transl Med. 2009; 7 https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-7-30

Minsalud. Update of the technical guidelines for the implementation of Kangaroo Mother Programs in Colombia, with emphasis on the nutrition of premature or low birth weight neonates [Actualización de los Lineamientos Técnicos para la implementación de Programas Madre Canguro en Colombia, con énfasis en la nutrición del neonato prematuro o de bajo peso al nacer]. 2017. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/implementacion-programa-canguro.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024)

Olaya-C M, Salcedo-Betancourt J, Galvis SH, Ortiz AM, Gutierrez S, Bernal JE Umbilical cord and preeclampsia. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2016; 9:(1)49-57 https://doi.org/10.3233/npm-16814108

Olaya-C M, Gil F, Salcedo JD, Salazar AJ, Silva JL, Bernal JE Anatomical pathology of the umbilical cord and its maternal and fetal clinical associations in 434 newborns. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2018; 21:(5)467-474 https://doi.org/10.1177/1093526618758204

Pinar H, Carpenter M Placenta and umbilical cord abnormalities seen with stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 53:(3)656-672 https://doi.org/10.1097/grf.0b013e3181eb68fe

Proctor LK, Fitzgerald B, Whittle WL Umbilical cord diameter percentile curves and their correlation to birth weight and placental pathology. Placenta. 2013; 34:62-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.10.015

REDCap. Research Electronic Data Capture REDCap. 2019. https://project-redcap.org/ (accessed 27 November 2024)

Rembouskos G, Cicero S, Papadopoulos V, Tripsanas C, Nicolaides KH Umbilical cord diameter at 11-14 weeks of gestation: relation to chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23:(3)237-239 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.969

Sherer DM, Al-Haddad S, Cheng R, Dalloul M Current perspectives of prenatal sonography of umbilical cord morphology. Int J Womens Health. 2021; 13:939-971 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S278747

Silver RM, Varner MW, Reddy U Work-up of stillbirth: a review of the evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196:(5)433-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.041

Stefos T, Sotiriadis A, Vasilios D Umbilical cord length and parity--the Greek experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 107:(1)41-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00307-x

Togni FA, Araujo Júnior E, Vasques FAP, Moron AF, Torloni MR, Nardozza LMM The cross-sectional area of umbilical cord components in normal pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 96:(3)156-161 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.003

Medial funiculi furcata: a rare umbilical cord alteration

02 January 2025
Volume 33 · Issue 1

Abstract

The umbilical cord is important for fetal life, newborn prognosis and fetal programming of adult disease. It is important to understand its anatomical features and how they relate to perinatal outcomes. Literature has described anatomical abnormalities in the umbilical cord in relation to the number of vessels, coiling direction, number and depth of coils, insertion, knots, length, diameter, entanglement and constrictions. Each feature represents a potential risk for fetal and neonatal prognosis. This article presents two case studies with unusual anatomical abnormalities of the umbilical cord, the first in a 34-week newborn and the other in a 14-week malformed fetus, both with a partial medial membranous separation of the umbilical cord vascular structures. The unusual macroscopic anatomical abnormalities in these cases were classed as medial funiculi furcata.

The umbilical cord is the conduit between the placenta and the fetus, transporting oxygen and nutrients while allowing fetal mobility (Sherer et al, 2021). Among its anatomical alterations, those associated with length, diameter, insertion, number of vessels, coiling and entanglements are widely recognised as causes of unfavorable outcomes (Olaya-C et al, 2018). This case study describes two cases of an uncommon umbilical cord abnormality, one fetal and one neonatal, for which very few descriptions are found. The case studies were carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and all procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (MF-CIE-0533-24).

Case 1

The first case involved a 33-year-old woman (gravida 4, para 2, miscarriage 1) at 34 weeks' gestation with a medical history of chronic hypertension, treated with nifedipine, alpha methyldopa and metoprolol. She also received acetylsalicylic acid and calcium supplementation as prophylaxis.

She was admitted with severe range blood pressure (≥160/110 mmHg), and was asymptomatic without end-organ damage. Fetal wellbeing was assessed by cardiotocography. Severe pre-eclampsia without expectant management criteria was considered the cause, so pharmacologic fetal lung maturation with betamethasone (Hall et al, 2024) was initiated, as well as labor induction with oxytocin. The patient presented severe range blood pressure again, associated with oppressive frontal headache that was not relieved by paracetamol. A caesarean section was performed as a result. Subsequently, new severe blood pressure was recorded and treated with two antihypertensive bolus doses and the patient was stabilised.

A male infant weighing 1820g was delivered, with Apgar scores of 8/10 and 9/10. During adaptation, he presented transient tachypnea of the newborn and required continuous positive airway pressure, and so was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. He received a dose of exogenous surfactant and oxygen supplementation using a low-flow nasal cannula. He was discharged with oxygen and ambulatory controls in the Kangaroo Mother Care Program (Minsalud, 2017).

The placental pathology evaluation showed it was circular, weighing 235g and measuring 14 x 13.5cm, with thickness ranging between 2.5 and 1.0cm. On the fetal side, an 18 x 1.5cm umbilical cord was observed; it was trivascular, white and had one coil to the right and central insertion. Along its length of approximately 7cm, there was a partial separation of the vascular structures, with one of the umbilical arteries separated from the other two vessels by a membrane (Figure 1, left). There were no other abnormalities in the placenta.

Figure 1. Funiculi furcata: partial separation of the vascular structures, with one of the umbilical arteries separated from the other two vessels by a membrane

Histologically, intervillous thrombus was observed, along with perivillous fibrin deposition as maternal vascular malperfusion. There was retroplacental hemorrhage/hematoma, increased syncytial trophoblast knots and wide acute infarction. There was chorionic surface vessel ectasia, vascular intramural fibrin deposition and stem vessel obliteration as fetal vascular malperfusion. In the membranes, decidual arteriopathy was observed, including fibrinoid necrosis, acute atherosis, mural hypertrophy, persistent muscularisation, arterial thrombosis by fibrin and chronic perivasculitis. The cord showed a membrane between two of the vessels.

Case 2

A 21-year-old woman (gravida 2, ectopic 1) at 14.6 weeks' gestation was admitted for one day with light brown, intermittent vaginal bleeding. She had previously sought obstetric consultation for the same bleeding.

In the first emergency admission, transvaginal ultrasound reported an endometrial hematoma involving more than 50% of the gestational sac; however, there was a normal decidual reaction. Additionally, fetal cardiac activity was confirmed both in the first and in the following two admissions, so it was considered a threatened miscarriage. On gynecological examination during the last admission, an open external os of the cervix was observed. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasounds reported a single fetus with absent cardiac activity and so it was considered a missed miscarriage. Dilation and curettage were performed.

In clinical fetal necropsy, the fetus was identified as a male of approximately 12 weeks' gestation by biometry, with advanced maceration signs and major and minor malformations, including left unilateral cleft lip and palate, penoscrotal transposition, omphalocele, pulmonary artery stenosis, left renal agenesis, agenesis of vermiform appendix, prognathism, contractures in four extremities, bilateral antecubital pterygium, clinodactyly of the left fifth finger, digitalisation of the left hand first finger and right radial agenesis with hypoplastic third finger. Microscopic examination did not reveal other pathological changes.

The placenta was fragmented, weighing 19g. An umbilical cord with a single umbilical artery was found with paracentral insertion measuring 8.5 x 0.1cm, which was short, as the expected value for age is 13cm. It was hypocoiled (coiling index of 0). Additionally, it showed a membranous separation between its two vessels (Figure 1, right). Fetal morphology and placental microscopic features were compatible with a chromosomal disorder.

Discussion

The umbilical cord is indisputably important for fetal life, newborn prognosis and fetal programming of adult disease. It is considered an extension of body circulation and the axis of novel neuroplacentology (Leon et al, 2022). In order to understand some unexpected outcomes, the anatomical features of the umbilical cord should be highlighted. The most common abnormalities are as shown in Figure 2 and are related to:

  • Number of vessels: usually three, sometimes two and eventually four (Di Naro et al, 2012; Ebbing et al, 2020)
  • Length: can be long or short, according to reference values for gestational age (Gilbert-Barness et al, 1993; Stefos et al, 2003; Martin de Llano et al, 2009)
  • Diameter: can be thin or thick, according to reference values for gestational age (Togni et al, 2007; Proctor et al, 2013). Extreme diameter decrease is called constriction (Silver et al, 2007)
  • Coiling index: number of coils divided by the cord length, classified as hypocoiled (less than 0.07 turns per cm) or hypercoiled (more than 0.3 turns per cm) (de Laat et al, 2006; 2007; Pinar and Carpenter, 2010)
  • Coiling direction: counterclockwise (left twist), dextrorotatory (clockwise) (Baergen, 2005) and bidirectional coiling (Olaya et al, 2018)
  • True knots: usually one but can be more (Baergen, 2013; Hayes et al, 2020)
  • Entanglements: most commonly around the neck but could occur in other fetal body parts (Linde et al, 2018; Hammad et al, 2020)
  • The amniotic web or ‘chord’ at the insertion site, which corresponds to a cord partially covered by a fold of amnion at its placental end
  • Insertion: marginal, velamentous, furcate and paramarginal (1cm or less from the placental margin) (Hasegawa et al, 2006; Ebbing et al, 2017).
  • Figure 2. Umbilical cord abnormalities. A: Single umbilical artery. B: Short umbilical cord. C: Long umbilical cord. D: Thin (left) and thick (right) umbilical cords. E: Hypocoiled umbilical cord. F: Hypercoiled umbilical cord. G: Levo-rotatory umbilical cord. H: Dextro-rotatory umbilical cord. I: True knots (also hypocoiled and marginal insertion). J: Entanglements. K: Amniotic web at insertion site. L: Velamentous insertion. M: Marginal insertion. N: Furcate insertion

    Insertion was connected to the anatomical abnormality described in this case study. In both cases, the umbilical vessels were separated without sufficient Wharton's jelly; simultaneously, they were joined by a flattened membrane far from the insertion site into the placenta.

    In the literature, only two other similar cases have been described, referred to as ‘funiculi furcata’. The term ‘insertio funiculi furcata’ was coined in 1923 to describe umbilical cord insertion in the placenta, which is now known as ‘furcate cord insertion’ (González Manzanilla et al, 1996). This condition involves branched vessels lacking Wharton's jelly protection before reaching the placenta. Etymologically, ‘funiculus’ refers to the umbilical cord, and ‘furcata’ means forked or branched. The term accurately describes what was seen in the umbilical vessels in these cases; however, the alteration ran along the cord, far from its insertion site. Thus, the authors suggest including the location when classifying this abnormality: medial funiculi furcata.

    The authors were able to verify the rarity of these cases: of the 1170 cases registered in the REDCap (2019) database of perinatal pathology, the two cases described are the only ones recorded between 2019 and 2024 (<0.2% of cases).

    Both cases presented the same apparency: the first in the context of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with neonatal complications, and the second in a malformed fetus with umbilical cord alterations. Both conditions have been associated with umbilical cord anatomical abnormalities. The most common finding in preeclampsia is a thinner or leaner umbilical cord (Ferguson and Dodson, 2009), as well as hypocoiling (Goynumer et al, 2008), but other abnormalities have been described (Olaya et al, 2016). Association between chromosomal disorders and umbilical cord abnormalities is also known, and leaner diameter (Rembouskos et al, 2004), abnormal insertion (Hasegawa et al, 2006), single umbilical artery (Kaplan, 2007) and hypocoiling (de Laat et al, 2006) have been reported.

    Conclusions

    Despite years of observing the macroscopic appearance of the umbilical cord, anatomical alterations continue to emerge, often associated with fetal disorders or maternal complications during pregnancy. Careful observation of the umbilical cord provides important information about intrauterine life course.

    Key points

  • The anatomy of the umbilical cord is crucial for the fetus and newborn prognosis.
  • The umbilical cord is a continuation of the fetal cardiovascular system and the importance of the aorta and cava in extrauterine life must be understood.
  • The anatomy of the umbilical cord should be noted at birth.
  • Despite years of study, unusual anatomical features of the umbilical cord continue to be found, including the two cases of medial funicular furcata described in this case study.
  • CPD reflective questions

  • Have you ever encountered a case of an umbilical cord abnormality? How was it managed?
  • Anatomical defects of the umbilical cord influence the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. How would you discuss the potential risks with the woman in a case of a suspected umbilical cord abormality?
  • Umbilical cord abnormalities have potential long-term developmental and health implications for neonates. What services could you signpost a woman and her family to, in this case?