Ahn MO, Phelan HP Epidemiologic aspects of the postdates pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 32:(2)228-34
Annadale E How midwives accomplish natural birth: managing risk and balancing expectations. Social Problems. 1988; 35:(2)95-110
Anderson T The misleading myth of choice: the continuing oppression of women in childbirth. In: Kirkham M (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004
Basket TF, Nagele F Naegele's rule: a reappraisal. BJOG. 2000; 107:(11)1433-5
Baston HA, Green JM Have women become more willing to accept obstetric interventions and does this relate to mode of birth? Data from a prospective study. Birth. 2007; 34:(1)6-13
Beauchamp T, Childress J, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001
Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technology Assessment. 1999; 3:(1)
Beech B Choice – an abused concept that is past its sell-by date. AIMS Journal. 2005; 17:(4)
Bergsjø P, Denman DW, Hoffman HJ, Meirik O Duration of human singleton pregnancy: a population based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990; 69:(3)197-207
Bernischke K, Kaufman P Pathology of Human Placenta. 2000;
Bowlby JNew York: Basic Books; 1988
Bramadat IJ Induction of labor: an integrated review. Health Care for Women International. 1994; 15:(2)135-48
Bryers HM, Teijlingen MA Risk, theory, social and medical models: a critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery. 2010; 26:(5)488-96
Chalmers B Psychological aspects of pregnancy: some thoughts for the eighties. Soc Sci Med. 1982; 16:(3)323-31
Clarke RA Midwives, their employers and the UKCC: an eternally unethical triangle. Nursing Ethics. 1995; 2:(3)247-53
Cody WK Paternalism in nursing and health-care: central issues and their relation to theory. Nurs Sci Q. 2003; 16:(4)288-96
Conrad P Medicalization and social control. Annu Rev Sociol. 1992; 18:209-32
Cronk M The midwife: a professional servant?. In: Kirkham M (ed.). London: Macmillan Press; 2000
Dagustun J Beware the dead baby card. AIMS Journal. 2012; 24:(3)
Dahlen H Undone by fear? Deluded by trust?. Midwifery. 2009; 26:156-62
Davis D Spoilt for choice: consuming maternity care. British Journal of Midwifery. 2003; 11:574-8
Davis-Floyd RE The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38:(8)1125-40
Davis-Floyd R Birth as an American Rite of Passage, 2nd edn.. London: University of California Press; 2003
Declerq E, Sakala C, Corry M, Applebaum S Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National US Survey Of Women's Childbearing Experiences. 2006;
, Second edition. London: DH; 2009
Duff C, Sinclair M Exploring the risks associated with induction of labour: a retrospective study using the NIMATS database. J Adv Nurs. 2000; 31:(2)410-7
Edwards NP Why can't women just say no? And does it really matter?. In: Kirkham M (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004
Fleissig A Mothers' experiences of induction of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1991; 11:(1)S11-5
Foster IR, Lasser JLondon: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2011
Goldberg H Informed decision making in maternity care. J Perinat Educ. 2009; 18:(1)32-40
Green JM, Baston HA Feeling in control during labour: concepts, correlates and consequences. Birth. 2003; 30:(4)235-47
Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV: Child Care and Development Unit, University oF Cambridge; 1988
Griffith R, Tengnah C, Patel CPadstow: Learning Matters Ltd; 2010
Grimes DA, Snively GR Patients' understanding of medical risks: implications for generic counselling and research. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93:(6)910-4
Guadagnoli E, Ward P Patient participation in decisionmaking. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 47:(3)329-39
Hall WA, Tomkinson J, Tomkinson MCK Canadian care providers' and pregnant women's approaches to managing birth: minimizing risk while maximizing integrity. Qual Health Res. 2011; 22:(5)575-86
Handwerker L Medical risk: implicating poor pregnant women. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38:(5)665-75
Harrison MJ, Kushner KE, Benzies K, Rempel G, Kimak C Women's satisfaction with their involvement in health care decisions during a high-risk pregnancy. Birth. 2003; 30:(2)109-15
Hart G A timely birth. Midwifery Today. 2004; 72:10-4
Hayes M On the epistemology of risk: language, logic and social science. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 35:401-7
Heimstad R, Romunstad PR, Hyett J, Mattsson LA, Salvesen KA Women's experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labour for postterm pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86:(8)950-6
Henrikson TB, Wilcox AJ, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Epidemiology. 1995; 6:533-7
Hutchinson SA Responsible subversion: a study of rule-bending among nurses. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice. 1990; 4:(1)3-17
Jacoby A, Cartwright A Finding out about the views and experiences of maternity services users. In: Garcia J, Kilpatrick R, Richards M (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1990
Jamieson L Midwife empowerment through education. British Journal of Midwifery. 1994; 12:(2)47-8
Jomeen J, Martin CR The impact of choice of maternity care on psychological health outcomes for women during pregnancy and the postnatal period. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 14:(3)391-8
Jordan B Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In: Davis-Floyd R, Sargent C (eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997
Jukic AM, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, McConnaughey DR, Wilcox AJ Length of human pregnancy and contributors to its natural variation. Human Reproduction. 2013; 28:(10)2848-55
Kirkham M The culture of midwifery in the National Health Service in England. J Adv Nurs. 1999; 30:(3)732-9
Kirkham M, Stapleton H The culture of the maternity services in Wales and England as a barrier to informed choice. In: Kirkham M (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004
Kitzinger SLondon: Routledge; 2006
Klein S The science of happiness.New York: Avalon; 2002
Kukla ROxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2005
Leap N Making sense of ‘horizontal violence’ in midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery. 1997; 5:(11)
Leap N The less we do, the more we give. In: Kirkham M (ed.). London: Macmillan Press; 2000
Levy V Protective steering: a grounded theory study of the process by which midwives facilitate informed choices during pregnancy. J Adv Nurs. 1998b; 29:(1)104-12
Lloyd A The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual Health Care. 2001; 10:i14-8
Lupton DLondon: Routledge; 1999
Lyerly AD Risks, values, and decision-making in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109:(4)979-84
Mallardi V The origin of informed consent. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2005; 25:(5)312-27
Mander R Who chooses the choices?. Modern Midwife. 1993; 3:(1)23-5
Mander R, Melender H Choice in maternity: rhetoric, reality and resistance. Midwifery. 2009; 25:637-48
Mannino F Neonatal complications of postterm gestation. J Reprod Med. 1988; 33:(3)271-6
Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Mitchie S A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations. 2001; 4:99-108
Melender HL Experiences of fears associated with pregnancy and birth: a study of 329 pregnant women. Birth. 2002; 29:101-11
Menticoglou SM, Hall PF Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks gestation: nonsensus consensus. BJOG. 2002; 109:485-91
Murphy-Lawless J Piggy in the middle: the midwife's role in achieving women-controlled childbirth. Irish Journal of Psychology. 1991; 12:(2)198-215
Murtagh M, Folan M Women's experiences of induction of labour for post-date pregnancy. BJM. 2014; 22:(2)105-10
Nautila M, Halmesmaki E, Hiilesmaa V, Ylikorkala O Women's anticipations of experiences with induction of labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999; 78:704-9
Oakley ALondon: Basil Blackwell; 1984
Oakley ACambridge: Polity Press; 2000
Oberman M Mothers and doctors' orders: unmasking the doctor's fiduciary role in fetal-maternal conflicts. Northwestern University Law Review. 2000; 94:(2)451-501
O'Cathain A, Thomas K, Walters SJ, Nicholl J, Kirkham M Women's perception of informed choice in maternity care. Midwifery. 2002; 18:136-44
Out JJ, Veirhout ME, Verhage F, Duivenvoorden HJ, Wallenburg HCS Elective induction of labour: a prospective clinical study. II. Psychological effects. J Perinatal Medicine. 1985; 13:163-70
Roberts LJ, Young KR The management of prolonged pregnancy – an analysis of women's attitudes before and after term. BJOG. 1991; 98:(11)1102-6
Salmon P, Drew NC Multidimensional assessment of women's experience of childbirth: relationship to obstetric procedure, antenatal history and obstetric history. J Psychosom Res. 1992; 36:(4)317-27
Sandall J Occupational burnout in midwives: new ways of working and the relationship between organisational factors and psychological health and well-being. Risk Decision and Policy. 1998; 3
Savage WLondon: Virago Press; 1986
Schore ANew York: WW Norton & Company; 2003
Shetty A, Burt R, Rice P, Templeton A Women's perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour – a questionnaire-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005; 123:56-61
Silverman WA The myth of informed consent: in daily practice and in clinical trials. J Med Ethics. 1989; 15:(1)6-11
Singh D, Newburn M, Smith N, Wiggins M The information needs of first-time mothers. British Journal of Midwifery. 2002; 10:(1)54-8
Shy KK Antenatal testing and candid reassurance. Birth. 1991; 18
Spaeth GL Informed choice versus informed consent. Hektoen International. 2010; 2:(2)
Spurgeon P, Hicks C, Barwell F Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care. Midwifery. 2001; 17:(2)123-32
Smith GC Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post-term in singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184:(3)489-96
Stahl K, Hundley V Risk and risk assessment in pregnancy – do we scare because we care?. Midwifery. 2003; 10:298-309
Stewart P Patient attitudes to induction and labour. BMJ. 1977; 2:749-52
Stewart M Whose evidence counts? An exploration of health professionals' perceptions of evidence-based practice, focusing on the maternity services. Midwifery. 2001; 1:279-88
Strasser T, Gallagher J The ethics of health communication. World Health Forum. 1994; 15:175-7
SzureK J Resistance to technology-enhanced childbirth in Tuscany. In: Davis-Floyd R, Sargent CF (eds.). LA: University of California Press; 1997
Verny TNew York: Simon & Schuster; 2002
Vorherr H Placental insufficiency in relation to postterm pregnancy and fetal postmaturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975; 123:(1)67-103
Wagner M Midwives and Cytotec: a true story. Midwifery Today. 2001; 57
Walsh D, Newburn M Professional issues. Towards a social model of childbirth. BJM. 2002; 10:476-81
Walsh DAbingdon: Routledge; 2007
Cardiff: Knowledge And Analytical Services, Welsh Government; 2012
Westfall RE, Benoit C The rhetoric of ‘natural’ in natural childbirth: childbearing women's perspectives on prolonged pregnancy and induction of labour. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59:(7)1397-408
Wickham SLondon: Elsevier; 2006
Wittmann-Price RA Emancipation in decision-making in women's health care. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 47:(4)437-45
Appropriate Technology for Birth. Lancet. 1985; 326:(8452)436-7
