References
Damages awarded for ‘nervous shock’ at a birth
Abstract
Claiming compensation for post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from a birth experience is unusual. Andrew Symon provides an overview of a recent case
A recent court case heard a claim by a baby's mother and grandmother for damages relating to ‘nervous shock’ following a birth complicated by dystocia (RE and others v Calderdale, 2017). To claim such damages, an injury must have been directly caused by a traumatic incident that occurred because of someone else's negligence. To succeed, the claimants had to establish that the midwives and/or medical staff had been negligent during the birth of a baby who suffered a significant hypoxic ischaemic insult.
The case was hugely complicated by a series of mishaps and errors relating to the clinical case records. In the first place, the defendant NHS Trust destroyed the original records after the legal claim had been raised. Digital copies had been made, but these proved less than ideal:
‘The integrity of the records cannot be guaranteed. The photocopies, some of which are in colour and some in monochrome, are not of good quality for forensic purposes and there are puzzling differences between some of the copies of the original documents and the digitised version’
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Limited access to our clinical or professional articles
-
New content and clinical newsletter updates each month