References

The Quality Improvement Guide: The Improving Quality Together Edition.Cardiff: 1000 Lives Improvement; 2014

Balasubramanian BA, Cohen DJ, Davis MM Learning evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations. Implement Sci. 2015; 10 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0219-z

Foy R, Sales A, Wensing M Implementation science: a reappraisal of our journal mission and scope. Implement Sci. 2015; 10 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0240-2

Iles V, Sutherland K. Managing change in the NHS: Organisational Change: A review for health care managers, professionals and researchers.London: SDO; 2001

Kirkup B. The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation.London: TSO; 2015

The importance of people and context in change management. 2011. http://rosariolongo.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/importance-of-people-and-context-in.html

Machiavelli N. The Prince. 1513 (Reprinted Harmondsworth: Penguin;1970) National Maternity Review. Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England.London: NHS England; 2016

The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives.London: NMC; 2015

Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS framework—a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based care. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004; 19:(4)297-304

The value of evidence in change

02 October 2018
Volume 26 · Issue 10

Abstract

An over-emphasis on targets, a lack of communication and worries about learning new skills: change can be daunting. But, as Jonathan Cliffe writes, knowing the evidence can help midwives prepare

Famous Florentine writer, philosopher and historian Niccolò Machiavelli once said that, ‘there is nothing more difficult to carry out nor more doubtful of success nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things’ (Machiavelli, 1513). Putting research findings into practice has become increasingly recognised as a high priority among researchers and policy-makers (Foy et al, 2015); however, implementing change in organisations has historically been a complex and dynamic process that is not always successful. Balasubramanian et al (2015) suggested that change in healthcare is often focused on outcomes or targets, bypassing the educational aspect, and that individuals may be reluctant to amend their practice if they are unaware of the evidence that supports it.

Maternity services have seen several changes in recent years as a result of research findings or from the development of new technology, medicines and equipment. Significant national reviews of maternity services, such as Kirkup (2015), also have an effect on practice: often recommendations from these reviews are a high priority when it comes to making changes in maternity services, as evidenced by the publication of Better Births (National Maternity Review, 2016).

The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework looks at the processes involved in implementing change based on research into practice (Rycroft-Malone, 2004), and proposes a 3-step approach of evidence, context and facilitation. Rycroft-Malone (2004) suggests that in order for change to be implemented, it needs to be based on a strong foundation of evidence, set within a clear context and supported by appropriate measures.

Meetings can help to keep staff informed

Barriers to change

One potential barrier is that individuals may not agree with proposed changes, and staff cope with this in their own ways. Depending on proposals, some staff may feel they are no longer in control or know what their future may hold. Some may feel they do not have the skills to manage the transition and may become uncomfortable when faced with new tasks because they do not know how to perform them (Iles, 2001). For new initiatives to be successful, barriers have to be identified and solutions put in place (1000 Lives Improvement, 2014). With the correct vision, skills, incentives, resources and action plans, change can be effective. If just one of those crucial factors is missing, it can be complex.

Longo (2011) highlighted the importance of communicating to staff the benefits of proposals. Good communication can aid the change process, as it may reduce some of the fears and questions staff may have, and staff are more likely to support and participate if they have a full understanding of what will happen.

Conclusion

Change is most successful when there is sufficient supporting evidence, which can help to reassure staff who are unsure. It is therefore the role of any midwife to ensure that their practice is based on the most recent evidence, to ensure care is clinically effective, safe and evidence-based (Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2015).