References

Guideline for Routine Examination of the Newborn.Newport: Aneurin Bevan University Health Board; 2015

Baker K. Midwives should perform the routine examination of the newborn. Br J Midwifery. 2010; 18:(7)416-21 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2010.18.7.48780

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001

Fear amongst midwives. RCM Midwives Magazine. 2015; 60-3

Bloomfield L, Townsend J, Rogers C. A qualitative study exploring junior paediatricians', midwives', GPs' and mothers' experiences and views of the examination of the newborn baby. Midwifery. 2003a; 19:(1)37-45 https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2002.0323

Bloomfield L, Rogers C, Townsend J, Wolke D, Quist-Therson E. The quality of routine examinations of the newborn performed by midwives and SHOs; an evaluation using video recordings. J Med Screen. 2003b; 10:(4)176-80 https://doi.org/10.1258/096914103771773267

Midwifery 2020: Delivering expectations.London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2010

Clarke E. Law and Ethics for Midwifery.Abingdon: Routledge; 2015

Davies L, McDonald S. Examination of the Newborn and Neonatal Health: A Multidimensional Approach.Oxford: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008

Making a Difference: Strengthening the Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Contribution to Public Health.London: The Stationary Office; 1999

Dunn PM. Examination of the newborn in the UK: a personal viewpoint. J Neonatal Nurs. 2001; 7:(2)55-7

Foster IR, Lasser J. Professional Ethics in Midwifery Practice.Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2011

Griffith R, Tengnah C, Patel C. Law and Professional Issues in Midwifery.Exeter: Learning Matters; 2010

Health for All Children, 4th edn, revised. In: Hall DMB, Elliman C (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006

Hayes J, Dave S, Rogers C, Quist-Therson E, Townsend J. A national survey in England of the routine examination of the newborn baby. Midwifery. 2003; 19:(4)277-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-6138(03)00044-5

International Confederation of Midwives. ICM Definitions. 2018. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/our-work/policy-and-practice/icm-definitions.html (accessed 21 November 2018)

Jones SR. Making ethical decisions. In: Raynor MD, Marshall JE, Sullivan A (eds). Edinburgh: Elsevier;

Lee TWR, Skelton RE, Skene C. Routine neonatal examination: effectiveness of trainee paediatrician compared with advanced neonatal nurse practitioner. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001; 85:(2)100-104 https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.85.2.F100

Lomax A. Expanding the midwifes role in examining the newborn. Br J Midwifery. 2001; 9:(2)100-2 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2001.9.2.8009

Mcdonald G. The examination of the newborn: A literature review. Br J Midwifery. 2013; 21:(1)24-9 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2013.21.1.24

McDonald S, Allan H, Brown A. Perceptions of changing practice in the examination of the newborn, from holistic to opportunistic. Br J Midwifery. 2012; 20:(11)786-91 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2012.20.11.786

Mckinnon K. How do junior doctors learn the newborn and physical examination?. Arch Dis Child. 2017; 102

Mitchell M. Midwives conducting the neonatal examination: part 1. Br J Midwifery. 2003; 11:(1)16-21 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2003.11.1.11006

Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England.London: NHS England; 2016

Routine examination of the newborn.Edinburgh: NHS Quality Improvement Scotland; 2008

The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives.London: NMC; 2015

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Revalidation. 2018. http://revalidation.nmc.org.uk (accessed 12 June 2018)

Osborne K. Are specially trained midwives the right professionals to perform the newborn physical examination?. Br J Midwifery. 2017; 25:(3)174-9 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2017.25.3.174

Newborn and Infant Physical Examination Screening Programme Standards 2016/17.London: Public Health England; 2016

Rogers C, Yearley C, Jay A. Education provision for the newborn physical examination as a post-registration module: national survey. Br J Midwifery. 2017; 25:(2)88-92 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2017.25.2.88

Annual Report.London: RCM; 2002

Townsend J, Wolke D, Hayes J Routine examination of the newborn: the EMREN study. Evaluation of the extension of the midwife role including a randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained midwives and pediatric senior house officers. Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8:(14)iii-iv

Yearley C, Rogers C, Jay A. Including the newborn physical examination in the pre-registration midwifery curriculum: national survey. Br J Midwifery. 2017; 25:(1)26-32 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2017.25.1.26

Legal and ethical considerations for midwives performing the neonatal infant physical examination

02 January 2019
Volume 27 · Issue 1

Abstract

The newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE) is part of a national screening programme in the UK that involves the first full physical assessment of the newborn. The examination aims to identify conditions and diseases early in order for prompt intervention and treatment to be arranged. Historically, the examination has lain solely in the paediatrician's remit; however, the more recent shift in midwifery care provision has led to a focus on midwifery-led care, continuity of carer and seamless care, which has brought the NIPE into the midwife's sphere of practice. There has been increasing evidence demonstrating that the midwife is the most suitable practitioner to conduct the NIPE following appropriate training; however, this has not been evaluated in recent years. Midwives are supported professionally, legally and ethically to conduct this examination, provided that they work within their sphere of practice and professional guidelines.

The newborn and infant physical examination (NIPE) is a national screening programme in the UK that involves a full physical assessment, history-taking, health promotion and education (Baker, 2010). The aim of the programme is early identification of conditions and diseases in newborn babies (Baker, 2010), and Public Health England (2016) recommends that the examination is carried out within the first 72 hours of life to ensure that prompt and appropriate treatment is commenced if required.

The examination has been a vital part of the child health surveillance programme in the UK since the 1960s (Hayes et al, 2003) and was conducted by neonatal senior house officers within the hospital setting before discharge (Mckinnon, 2017). However, in more recent times, there has been a shift towards midwifery-led care, which has increased rates of homebirth and births in standalone midwife-led units (Chief Nursing Officers of England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, 2010; National Maternity Review, 2016). There is also increasing workload and pressure on junior doctors, which has caused constraints on the amount of clinical time available to complete the NIPE. This has become one of the main drivers behind training midwives to complete the NIPE (Baker, 2010). There is a demand for expanding services to include more outpatient provision, including at home or in standalone birth centres, for services such as the NIPE, which can be satisfied by training midwives to complete the examination. This is also an opportunity for multidisciplinary working between junior neonatal doctors and midwives and a chance for midwives to widen their scope of practice (Baker, 2010). It is therefore important to consider the legal, ethical and professional issues surrounding the role of the midwife in conducting the NIPE.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month