References

Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6:(6) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006672.pub3

Abdelhakim AM, Eldesouky E, Elmagd IA Antenatal perineal massage benefits in reducing perineal trauma and postpartum morbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Urogynecol J. 2020; 31:(9)1735-1745 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04302-8

Aniball.uk. Troubsko (Czech Republic). 2020. https://aniball.uk/how-to-use-aniball-instructions/ (accessed 15 December 2020)

Bohatá P, Dostálek L. The possibility of antepartal prevention of episiotomy and perineal tears during delivery. Čes Gynek. 2016; 81:(3)192-201

Brito LG, Ferreira CH, Duarte G Antepartum use of Epi-No birth trainer for preventing perineal trauma: systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26:(10)1429-1436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2687-8

DeLancey JO. What's new in the functional anatomy of pelvic organ prolapse?. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 28:(5)420-429 https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000312

Dietz HP, Bernardo MJ, Kirby A Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22:(6)699-704 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1329-4

Dietz HP, Pattillo Garnham A, Guzmán Rojas R. Is it necessary to diagnose levator avulsion on pelvic floor muscle contraction?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49:(2)252-256 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15832

Epino.de. Munich (Germany). 2020. https://www.epino.de/en/epi-no.html (accessed 15 December 2020)

Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Delivery mode and the risk of levator muscle avulsion: a meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30:(6)901-907 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3827-8

Haya N, Feiner B, Baessler K Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 8:(8) https://doi.org/10.1002%2F14651858.CD013105

Hillebrenner J, Wagenpfeil S, Schuchardt R Initial experiences with primiparous women using a new kind of Epi-no labor trainer. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2001; 205:(1)12-19 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-14552

Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Langer S Does the Epi-No(®) birth trainer prevent vaginal birth-related pelvic floor trauma? A multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2016; 123:(6)995-1003 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13924

Kavvadias T, Hoesli I. The EpiNo® device: efficacy, tolerability, and impact on pelvic floor-implications for future research. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016; 2016 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3818240

Kok J, Tan KH, Koh S Antenatal use of a novel vaginal birth training device by term primiparous women in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2004; 45:(7)318-323

Kovacs GT, Heath P, Heather C. First Australian trial of the birth-training device Epi-No: a highly significantly increased chance of an intact perineum. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 44:(4)347-348 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.2004.00265.x

Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JO Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103:(1)31-40 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000109207.22354.65

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190/ (accessed 4 January 2023)

Schreiner L, Crivelatti I, de Oliveira JM Systematic review of pelvic floor interventions during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018; 143:(1)10-18 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12513

Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Langer S Does the Epi-No birth trainer reduce levator trauma? A randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22:(12)1521-1528 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1517-x

Sultan AH. Obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk. 1999; 5:193-196 https://doi.org/10.1177/135626229900500601

Švabík K, Shek KL, Dietz HP. How much does the levator hiatus have to stretch during childbirth?. BJOG. 2009; 116:(12)1657-1662 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02321.x

van Delft K, Thakar R, Sultan AH Levator ani muscle avulsion during childbirth: a risk prediction model. BJOG. 2014; 121:(9)1155-1163 https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12676

van Reijn-Baggen DA, Voorham-van der Zalm Han-Geurts IJM Pelvic floor physical therapy for pelvic floor hypertonicity: a systematic review of treatment efficacy. Sex Med Rev. 2022; 10:(2)209-230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.03.002

Youssef A, Salsi G, Cataneo I Fundal pressure in second stage of labor (Kristeller maneuver) is associated with increased risk of levator ani muscle avulsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53:(1)95-100 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19085

Investigating antenatal pelvic floor training using a vaginal balloon device in Czech women

02 February 2023
Volume 31 · Issue 2

Abstract

Background/Aims

A vaginal balloon device for antenatal pelvic floor training may reduce the incidence of negative outcomes from vaginal birth on women's pelvic health. This study's aims were to investigate the effect of antenatal vaginal training on birth-induced levator ani muscle avulsion and to analyse the relationship between use of a balloon device for training and the duration of the second stage of labour, incidence of episiotomy and birth-induced perineal trauma.

Methods

In this prospective cohort intervention study, 123 nulliparous women were divided into two groups: 64 training with the device antenatally (intervention) and 59 women receiving normal antenatal care (control). Clinical data were collected 10 weeks after birth and differences in the incidence of levator ani muscle avulsion, episiotomy, perineal tears and other birth injuries, as well as the duration of the second stage of labour, were assessed using two-tailed tests.

Results

Training with the device was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of levator ani muscle avulsions (P=0.82), and the device did not shorten the duration of the second stage of labour (P=0.63). However, it was associated with a reduction in the frequency of episiotomies (cases: 34% vs controls: 59%; P=0.007). There was no significant difference in the incidence of perineal tears (P=1.00) or other birth injuries (P=0.50). An obstetric anal sphincter injury occurred in only one case, in a woman in the control group.

Conclusions

The use of an antenatal training device in nulliparous women with cephalic vaginal birth at term is not associated with better pelvic health outcomes. However, it may reduce the frequency of episiotomies.

Vaginal birth is an established risk factor for pelvic floor trauma (Švabík, 2009; Kamisan Atan et al, 2016). This trauma may include avulsion of the levator ani muscle from the inferior pubic ramus (macrotrauma) or irreversible levator ani muscle overdistension (microtrauma) (Kamisan Atan et al, 2016).

Pelvic floor trauma is most frequently caused by overdistension during the second stage of labour, primarily affecting the pubococcygeus muscle (Lien et al, 2004; Švabík, 2009). The incidence of levator ani muscle avulsion ranges from 10–35% (van Delft et al, 2014; Kamisan Atan et al, 2016) and the use of forceps significantly increases this risk (Friedman et al, 2019). Additionally, levator ani muscle avulsion is associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury, prolonged second stage of labour (van Delft et al, 2014) and the application of pressure on the uterine fundus during the second stage of labour, also known as the Kristeller maneuvre (Youssef et al, 2019).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting British Journal of Midwifery and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for midwives. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to our clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month