References

Acharya DR, Bell JS, Simkhada P, Van Teijlingen ER, Regmi PR. Women's autonomy in household decision-making: a demographic study in Nepal. Reprod Health. 2010; 7:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-15

Acharya K, Paudel YR, Silwal P. Sexual violence as a predictor of unintended pregnancy among married young women: evidence from the 2016 Nepal demographic and health survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2342-3

Ahmed A, Hafez A. Factors affecting the family planning methods used by the currently married women in rural Egypt. Am J Res Comm. 2014; 2:(10)324-341

Adolescent reproductive health in Yemen; status, policies, programs, and issues. 2003. https://bit.ly/3MkWnBJ (accessed 5 October 2022)

Alhassan AY, Abdul-Rahim A, Akaabre PB. Knowledge, awareness and perceptions of females on clandestine abortion in Kintampo north municipality, Ghana. Eur Sci J. 2016; 12:(12)95-95 https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n12p95

Arifin H, Widiasih R, Pradipta RO, Kurniawati Y. Regional disparities and their contribution to the coverage of the tetanus toxoid vaccine among women aged 15–49 years in Indonesia. F1000Research. 2021; 10:437-437 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.53004.1

Ajayi AI, Ezegbe HC. Association between sexual violence and unintended pregnancy among adolescent girls and young women in South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09488-6

Badan Pusat Statistik. Peraturan Kepala Badan Pusat Statistik Nomor 37 Tahun 2010 Tentang Klasifikasi Perkotaan dan Perdesaan di Indonesia. 2010. https://bit.ly/3eqVqei (accessed 5 October 2022)

Bain LE, Muftugil-Yalcin S, Amoakoh-Coleman M, Zweekhorst MBM, Becquet R, De Cock Buning T. Decision-making preferences and risk factors regarding early adolescent pregnancy in Ghana: stakeholders' and adolescents' perspectives from a vignette-based qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2020; 17:(1)1-12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00992-x

Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disorders. 2016; 191:62-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014

Bledsoe SE, Rizo CF, Wike TL Pregnant adolescent women's perceptions of depression and psychiatric services in the United States. Women Birth. 2017; 30:(5)e248-e257 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.02.006

Brauer M, van Ditzhuijzen J, Boeije H, van Nijnatten C. Understanding decision-making and decision difficulty in women with an unintended pregnancy in the Netherlands. Qual Health Res. 2019; 29:(8)1084-1095 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318810435

Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Biol Med. 2008; 3:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-3-17

Croft TN, Marshall AMJ, Allen CK. Guide to DHS statistics.Virginia, US: ICF International; 2018

Darroch JE, Woog V, Bankole A. Adding it up: costs and benefits of meeting the contraceptive needs of adolescents.New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2016

Dharma ADS Keberagaman Pengaturan Batas Usia Dewasa Seseorang Untuk Melakukan Perbuatan Hukum Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Repertorium. 2015; 2:(2)2355-2646

Dehlendorf C, Harris LH, Weitz TA. Disparities in abortion rates: a public health approach. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103:(10)1772-1779 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301339

The Demographic and Health Survey Program. Demographic Health Survey - guide to DHS statistics. 2017. https://bit.ly/3MlkDUb (accessed 5 October 2022)

The Demographic Health Survey Program. Wealth quintiles. 2018. https://bit.ly/3rK1z8C (accessed 5 October 2022)

Frederico M, Michielsen K, Arnaldo C, Decat P. Factors influencing abortion decision-making processes among young women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15:(2) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020329

Hanifa FN, Kurniawati HF. Teenagers' decision making about abortion as an action to terminate. Midwiferia Jurnal Kebidanan. 2020; 6:(2)44-48 https://doi.org/10.21070/midwiferia.v

Hornberger LL. Options counseling for the pregnant adolescent patient from the American academy of pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2017; 140:(3)20172274-20172274

Kantorová V. Unintended pregnancy and abortion: what does it tell us about reproductive health and autonomy?. Lancet. 2020; 8:(9)e1106-e1107 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30342-9

UU No. 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. https://bit.ly/3MniWpq (accessed 10 October 2022)

Kiranantika A. Pola Pengambilan Keputusan Mengenai Partisipasi dalam Program Keluarga Berencana pada Keluarga Muda di Kota Malang. Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya. 2013; 7:(1)51-61

Kusnanto K, Arifin H, Kurniawati Y. Determinant of BCG vaccine coverage among Indonesian children aged 0–2 months. Children Youth Serv Rev. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105238

Loi UR, Lindgren M, Faxelid E, Oguttu M, Klingberg-Allvin M. Decision-making preceding induced abortion: a qualitative study of women's experiences in Kisumu, Kenya. Reprod Health. 2018; 15:(166) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0612-6

Mafula D, Satrio Pambudi B. Optimization of telenursing in combating COVID-19: preparation for transitioning from pandemic to endemic era. J Palembang Nurs Stud. 2022; 1:(2)61-63 https://doi.org/10.55048/jpns.v1i2.20

Mahendradhata Y, Trisnantoro L, Listyadewi S The Republic of Indonesia Health System Review (Vol. 7).Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017

Makleff S, Wilkins R, Wachsmann H Exploring stigma and social norms in women's abortion experiences and their expectations of care. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019; 27:(3)50-64 https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1661753

Maxwell L, Nandi A, Benedetti A, Devries K, Wagman J, García MC. Intimate partner violence and pregnancy spacing: results from a meta-analysis of individual participant time-to-event data from 29 low and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2017; 3:1-13 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000304

McLeod J. Pengantar Konseling: Teori dan Studi Kasus.Indonesia: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2006

Mediarti D, Rosnani R, Sukartini T, Arifin H, Kurniawati Y. Coverage and factors associated with complete polio vaccination among Indonesian children aged 0–18 months. Children Youth Serv Rev. 2020; 118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105399

Moeliono BAdL. Gambaran Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Risk Taking Behavior Remaja Putri Yang Melakukan Aborsi Tidak Aman. Journal Ilmiah Psikologi MANASA. 2017; 6:(9)58-65

Moore AM, Frohwirth L, Miller E. Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70:(11)1737-1744 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.009

Mulawarman M, Munawaroh E. Psikologi Konseling: Sebuah Pengantar bagi Konselor Pendidikan.Indonesia: Universitas Negeri Semarang; 2016

Mulyanti L. Decision making pro life in teenagers with unwanted pregnancy in Semarang. Jurnal Kebidanan. 2017b; 6:(1) https://doi.org/10.26714/jk.6.1.2017.28-34

Murugesu L, Damman OC, Derksen ME Women's participation in decision-making in maternity care: a qualitative exploration of clients' health literacy skills and needs for support. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18:(3) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031130

Nadeem M, Malik MI, Anwar M, Khurram S. Women decision making autonomy as a facilitating factor for contraceptive use for family planning in Pakistan. Soc Indicat Res. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02633-7

Newnham EA, Chen Y, Gibbs L The mental health implications of domestic violence during COVID-19. Int J Public Health. 2022; https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2021.1604240

Nkhoma DE, Lin CP, Katengeza HL Girls' empowerment and adolescent pregnancy: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17:(5)1-14 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051664

Rata-rata Hamil Luar Nikah, Pernikahan Anak di Bone Tembus 463 Kasus. 2022. https://bit.ly/3rGFJ5R (accessed 10 October 2022)

Rachmawati PD, Kurnia ID, Asih MN Determinants of under-five mortality in Indonesia: a nationwide study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2022.02.005

Rahman M. Women's autonomy and unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant women in Bangladesh. Mat Child Health J. 2012; 16:(6)1206-1214 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0897-3

Ralph L, Gould H, Baker A, Foster DG. The role of parents and partners in minors' decisions to have an abortion and anticipated coping after abortion. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 54:(4)428-434 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.09.021

Rosnani R, Setyowati S, Koestoer RA, Widjaja BT, Mediarti D, Arifin H. Photobiomodulation: a cultural nursing intervention for physical and psychological adaptation. Br J Midwifery. 2022; 30:(5)258-268 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2022.30.5.258

Rizkianti A, Afifah T, Saptarini I, Rakhmadi MF. Women's decision-making autonomy in the household and the use of maternal health services: an Indonesian case study. Midwifery. 2020; 90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102816

Santelli J, Rochat R, Hatfield-Timajchy K The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003; 35:(2)94-101 https://doi.org/10.1363/3509403

Sarder A, Islam SMS, Maniruzzaman Talukder A, Ahammed B. Prevalence of unintended pregnancy and its associated factors: evidence from six south Asian countries. PLoS One. 2021; 16:(2) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245923

Sarmita IM. Lokika Sanggraha: Pengaruhnya Terhadap Aborsi dan Kesehatan Reproduksi Remaja Perempuan Bali. Media Komunikasi Geografi. 2015; 16:(1)53-66

Shah IH, Åhman E. Unsafe abortion differentials in 2008 by age and developing country region: high burden among young women. Reprod Health Matters. 2012; 20:(39)169-173 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39598-0

Sharma KK, Vatsa M, Kalaivani M, Bhardwaj D. Mental health effects of domestic violence against women in Delhi: a community-based study. J Family Med Primary Care. 2019; 8:(7)2522-2527 https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_427_19

Sharman LS, Douglas H, Price E, Sheeran N, Dingle GA. Associations between unintended pregnancy, domestic violence, and sexual assault in a population of Queensland women. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2019; 26:(4)541-552 https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1510347

Silverman JG, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: global barriers to women's reproductive control. PLoS Med. 2014; 11:(9) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001723

Smith W, Turan JM, White K Social norms and stigma regarding unintended pregnancy and pregnancy decisions: a qualitative study of young women in Alabama. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016; 48:(2)73-81 https://doi.org/10.1363/48e9016

Sopiatun R. Proses Pengambilan Keputusan tentang Aborsi di Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia (PKBI) Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB). Jurnal Kesehatan Prima. 2011; 5:(2)778-790

Profil Penduduk Indonesia Hasil SUPAS 2015.Indonesia: Statistics Indonesia; 2016

Indonesia young adult reproductive health survey 2007.Indonesia: BPS and Macro International; 2008

Preferences of adolescent in family planning in the future universitas Jember. 2015. https://bit.ly/3enAwg7 (accessed 10 October 2022)

Tegegn A, Yazachew M, Gelaw Y. Reproductive health knowledge and attitude among adolescents: a community based study in Jimma Town, southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2008; 22:(3)143-151

Testa MR. On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: individual- and country-level evidence. Adv Life Course Res. 2014; 21:28-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2014.01.005

Skosana MT, Peu MD, Mogale RS. Disconnections and exclusions of parents in the prevention of teenage pregnancy: a phenomenological approach. Int J Africa Nurs Sci. 2020; 13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100251

Laporan Akhir Penelitian Hukum tentang Perkembangan Hukum Adat di Propinsi Sulawesi Selatan. 2005. https://bit.ly/3EyK4j9 (accessed 10 October 2022)

Vyas S, Kumaranayake L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Planning. 2006; 21:(6)459-468 https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czl029

World Health Organization. Adolescent pregnancy. 2019. https://bit.ly/2REOUA5 (accessed 5 October 2022)

Zeleke LB, Alemu AA, Kassahun EA. Individual and community level factors associated with unintended pregnancy among pregnant women in Ethiopia. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11:1-9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92157-4

Zia Y, Mugo N, Ngure K Psychosocial experiences of adolescent girls and young women subsequent to an abortion in sub-Saharan Africa and globally: a systematic review. Front Reprod Health. 2021; 3:(May)1-13 https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2021.638013

Unwanted pregnancy in Indonesia: prevalence and decision making

02 November 2022
Volume 30 · Issue 11

Abstract

Background/Aims

Young women in Indonesia who experience an unwanted pregnancy may not have the necessary support to make an informed decision about whether to continue with or terminate the pregnancy. The aim of this study was to determine factors that influence the decision to terminate or continue with an unwanted pregnancy among women aged 15–24 years old in Indonesia.

Methods

Data from the 2017 Indonesian demographic and health survey were used. These data included 9218 women aged 15–24 years from eight regions in Indonesia. Chi-squared tests and binary and multivariable logistic regression were used to analyse the data.

Results

Almost 20% of women in Indonesia decided to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, and 25% experienced physical partner violence. Respondents who lived in Sulawesi, had primary education, lived in a rural area or had experienced physical partner violence were more likely terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Respondents who had a higher economic status were less likely terminate.

Conclusions

The decision to terminate a pregnancy may be more likely to be made by women under certain circumstances. Programmes for pregnant women involving counselling should be initiated via cross-collaboration with government, parents and healthcare workers, to provide support for decision making in the case of an unwanted pregnancy.

Women who have an unwanted pregnancy may decide to terminate that pregnancy and will experience social and, potentially, psychological changes that can affect their future (Frederico et al, 2018). Pregnancy at a young age increases the likelihood of a woman not finishing school, and teenagers who become pregnant must consider how to communicate with their parents, as they may encounter family disharmony or even a partner's demand for an abortion (Frederico et al, 2018). Women with an unwanted pregnancy may feel depressed, afraid, confused or embarrassed, and may be prone to emotional turmoil (Biaggi et al, 2016). They may also be pressured by their family, peers or environment and experience physical and psychological changes as a result of the pregnancy (Bledsoe et al, 2017; Rosnani et al, 2022). These factors may put pressure on women with an unwanted pregnancy to make a decision quickly, without considering the potential consequences, and can result in women having an abortion without indication or medical assistance (Kantorová, 2020).

Globally, approximately 21 million women aged 15–19 years old become pregnant every year; 49% of these pregnancies are unwanted, and more than half end in abortion (World Health Organization, 2019). In Asia, as many as 8.3 million women aged 15–19 years old become pregnant each year, 43% of which are unwanted and 28% of which end in abortion (Darroch et al, 2016).

Women aged 15–24 years old in developing countries are more vulnerable to unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortions (41%) (Shah and Åhman, 2012). In Indonesia, the age-specific fertility rate for women aged 15–19 years and 20–24 years is 40.1 and 109.7 per 1000 women respectively (Statistics Indonesia, 2016). A survey of Indonesian women aged 15–24 years old found that 1% of women and 6% of men had premarital sex, and 1% of women experienced an unwanted pregnancy, with 60% of them choosing to abort (Statistics Indonesia et al, 2008).

Women may need to make complex decisions to manage an unwanted pregnancy. Making the decision to abort or continue a pregnancy should include assessing the associated risks, as well as their ability to care for a child and the required preparation, before a decision is made (Moeliono, 2017). It may be difficult for teenagers to decide whether to continue an unwanted pregnancy; various factors have been shown to influence their decision-making at different levels (Alhassan et al, 2016). At the individual level, these factors include their perception of their ability to be a mother, the choice to continue their education, depression, financial problems and the potential burden of shame associated with a teenage pregnancy (Frederico et al, 2018; Zia et al, 2021). At the interpersonal level, these include support, parental attitudes, male participation, stigma, family expectations, norms, traditions, assumptions of others regarding religion and school achievement, parental child communication, taboo discussions on sex, partner readiness, finances and the desire to have children (Loi et al, 2018; Bain et al, 2020). Research specific to Indonesia has shown that the factors influencing decision making in women with an unwanted pregnancy include parental intervention (Mulyanti, 2017), family roles, birth intervals, number of children, economic circumstances, medical issues and the dominant role of the husband (Sopiatun, 2011).

Young women with an unwanted pregnancy may make a decision without considering the potential consequences, and should be given support for their decision-making. This assistance can include non-judgmental counselling, including on the legal options, and referral to appropriate services (Hornberger, 2017). In addition, adolescents should be targeted by family planning services, because they greatly contribute to fertility rates, new pregnancy outcomes and the use of contraception (Suryani et al, 2015). In Indonesia, within the family and community, unwanted pregnancies are viewed negatively (Mulyanti, 2017). The issue has become stigmatised in society, where women with an unwanted pregnancy outside of marriage are seen as women who have engaged in ‘bad’ behaviour (Smith et al, 2016; Makleff et al, 2019).

The decision to become pregnant should be a joint decision between a couple. If a husband is not ready to accept a pregnancy, there is a risk of coercion or violence (Ajayi and Ezegbe, 2020). If both partners are educated and financially stable, they may be more able to make an informed decision about a pregnancy (Smith et al, 2016). Counselling is effective in providing support to those with an unwanted pregnancy, if the counsellor can encourage a woman to freely share her thoughts; counsellors should be mindful of a woman's values, culture and other associated factors in these circumstances (Mulawarman and Munawaroh, 2016). Common associated factors include social class, age, ethnicity and gender (McLeod, 2006; Mafula and Satrio Pambudi, 2022).

It is important to provide support for women with an unwanted pregnancy, to help them make a decision on whether to continue with the pregnancy. This support can be provided through counselling appropriate to individual characteristics and circumstances. The present study examined factors associated with decision making for women aged 15–24 years with an unwanted pregnancy. Previous studies have revealed factors that should be considered when providing counselling to adolescents and adolescents' preferences regarding family planning (McLeod, 2006; Suryani et al, 2015; Mulawarman and Munawaroh, 2016; Mulyanti, 2017), but no factors related to decision making for unwanted pregnancies in adolescents have been established.

Methods

Study design

This cross-sectional study used secondary data from the Indonesian demographic and health survey, which is part of Inner City Fund International. Access to the dataset was requested through their website and approved (no. 156783). Written informed consent for each individual was taken during the survey's data collection procedure.

Sample size

The survey was conducted in December 2017. The IDIR71FL dataset (Indonesian Individual Recode phase 7) was used to obtain complete data on women aged 15–49 years, with a survey population of 49 627. The data were weighted based on the number of provinces in Indonesia, to obtain an average number of participants for each region. Two-stage stratified cluster sampling was used by the survey when collecting data, by selecting clusters from each stratum and a list of families from the selected clusters. The families to be interviewed were then selected, which included women aged 15–24 years old. In total, there were 9218 women, and any records with missing data were not used.

Variables

This study's independent variables were region, age, education, wealth index, residence, occupational status, whether the participant had ever visited a health facility, sex of household head, contraceptive methods, intention to use contraceptives, planning a new pregnancy, desire for more children and physical partner violence. Education was categorised as high, secondary, primary or no education (Kebudayaan, 2003). The wealth quintiles were richest, richer, middle, poorer and poorest (Croft et al, 2018; The Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) Program, 2018), based on principal component analysis (Vyas and Kumaranayake, 2006). Place of residence was categorised into rural and urban (Badan Pusat Statistik, 2010). Employment status was determined based on whether the participant was currently working (yes or no) (The DHS Program, 2017). For planning a new pregnancy, the categories were have another, undecided and no more. The desire to have more children was categorised as within 2 years, after 2 years, unsure on timing, undecided and no more (The DHS Program, 2017). Physical partner violence was categorised into beating if refuse to have sex with partner, beating if argue with partner and beating if go out without telling partner (The DHS Program, 2017).

The dependent variable was the decision on how to manage an unwanted pregnancy. Unwanted pregnancy was defined as unplanned or unwanted, such as a pregnancy that occurs when no children or no more children are desired (Santelli et al, 2003). The decision was categorised as either the decision for continuation (the participant intended to have the baby and either raise it themselves or make other arrangements) or termination (the respondent intended to have an abortion) (Brauer et al, 2019).

Data analysis

Data analysis was aided by STATA version 16.1 software. Univariate analysis was used to present the description of each variable to be studied in both independent and dependent variables. Chi-squared tests were conducted to analyse the determinants of the decision made. Variables were submitted for the final multivariable model if the P value at chi-square analysis was <0.25 (Bursac et al, 2008; Rachmawati et al, 2022).

Multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression was used to determine the independent variables that had the greatest influence on the dependent variable. Continuation was used as a reference. The strength of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables was tested using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The significant variables with P<0.05 and 95% confidence interval were considered determinants of the decision to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. To account for clustering effects and sampling weight resulting from the multistage cluster random sampling used to obtain data for the national survey, this study used STATA's ‘svy’ survey commands.

Ethical considerations

The authors received approval to access and download the survey data. The survey itself was approved by the institutional review board of Inner-City Fund International: ICF IRB no. FWA00000845. The project complies with all requirements of 45 CFR 46: protection of human subjects. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. For participants under 16 years old, informed consent was obtained from their parents. Information on the ethical review for the survey is available on the website: https://dhsprogram.com/Methodology/Protecting-the-Privacy-of-DHS-Survey-Respondents.cfm.

Results

The participants' demographic data are shown in Table 1. Most participants chose to continue with their pregnancy (81.2%). The greatest proportion of respondents was from Java (33.4%). The majority were between 15 and 19 years old (74.9%), had secondary education (68.8%) and were from middle to upper wealth levels (64.8%). Most lived in urban areas (61.5%), did not work (65.5%) and did not visit health facilities (74.5%). The head of almost all households was a man (83.2%). Most respondents did not use contraception (99.8%) at the time of data collection but intended to (81.2%), and were planning another pregnancy (93.5%) although most were unsure of the timing they wanted for future pregnancies (55.5%). A quarter of respondents experienced physical partner violence (25.5%). Most violence originated from a participant going out without telling their partner (21.2%).


Table 1. Demographic variables
Variable Category Frequency, n=9218 (%) Variable Category Frequency, n=9218 (%)
Decision for unwanted pregnancy Continuation 7480 (81.2) Currently working (cont) Yes 3180 (34.5)
Termination 1738 (18.9) Visiting health facility No 6863 (74.5)
Region (island) Sumatera 2268 (24.6)   Yes 2355 (25.6)
Riau 217 (2.4) Sex of household head Man 7671 (83.2)
Java 3076 (33.4)   Woman 1547 (16.8)
Bali and Nusa Tenggara 807 (8.8) Using contraceptive No 9196 (99.8)
Kalimantan 726 (7.9)   Yes 22 (0.2)
Sulawesi 1451 (15.7) Intention to use contraceptive No 1736 (18.8)
Maluku 513 (5.6)   Yes 7482 (81.2)
Papua 160 (1.7) Desire for future pregnancies Yes, have another 8614 (93.5)
Age (years) 15–19 6908 (74.9)   Undecided 548 (5.9)
20–24 2310 (25.1)   No, have no more 56 (0.6)
Education High 2587 (28.1) Timing of future pregnancies Within 2 years 462 (5.0)
Secondary 6337 (68.8)   After 2 years 3034 (32.9)
Primary 277 (3.0)   Unsure 5118 (55.5)
None 17 (0.2)   Undecided 548 (5.9)
Wealth index Poorest 1596 (17.3)   No more 56 (0.6)
Poorer 1659 (18.0) Physical partner violence No 6872 (74.6)
Middle 1766 (19.2)   Yes 2346 (25.5)
Richer 1923 (20.9) Beaten if refuse to have sex with partner No 8408 (91.2)
Richest 2274 (24.7)   Yes 810 (8.8)
    Beaten if argue with partner No 8599 (93.3)
Residence Urban 5672 (61.5)   Yes 619 (6.7)  
Rural 3546 (38.5) Beaten if go out without telling partner No 7264 (78.8)
Currently working No 6038 (65.5)   Yes 1954 (21.2)

Bivariate analysis found that region, age, education, wealth index, residence, visits to a health facility, planning a future pregnancy and physical partner violence were correlated with the decision to terminate an unwanted pregnancy (Table 2). These variables were subjected to multivariate analysis.


Table 2. Bivariate analysis
Variable Category Continuation (%) Termination (%) X2 P value
Region (island) Sumatera 423 (4.6) 1845 (20.0) 72.99 <0.001
Riau 39 (0.4) 178 (1.9)    
Java 451 (4.9) 2625 (28.5)    
Bali and Nusa Tenggara 197 (2.1) 610 (6.6)    
Kalimantan 148 (1.6) 578 (6.3)    
Sulawesi 327 (3.6) 1124 (12.2)    
Maluku 120 (1.3) 393 (4.3)    
Papua 33 (0.4) 127 (1.4)    
Age (years) 15–19 5523 (59.9) 1385 (15.0) 25.72 <0.001
20–24 1957 (21.2) 353 (3.8)    
Education High 373 (4.1) 2214 (24.0) 57.89 <0.001
Secondary 1285 (13.9) 5052 (54.8)    
Primary 78 (0.9) 199 (2.2)    
None 2 (0.02) 15 (0.2)    
Wealth index Poorest 440 (4.8) 1156 (12.5) 119.69 <0.001
Poorer 337 (3.7) 1322 (14.3)    
Middle 325 (3.5) 1441 (15.6)    
Richer 299 (3.2) 1624 (17.6)    
Richest 337 (3.7) 1937 (21.0)    
Residence Urban 927 (10.1) 4745 (51.5) 60.76 <0.001
Rural 811 (8.8) 2735 (29.7)    
Currently working No 1161 (12.6) 4877 (52.9) 1.59 0.206
Yes 577 (6.2) 2603 (28.2)    
Visiting health facility No 1338 (14.5) 5525 (59.9) 7.22 0.007
Yes 400 (4.3) 1955 (21.2)    
Sex of household head Man 1464 (15.9) 6207 (67.3) 1.58 0.208
Woman 274 (3.0) 1273 (13.8)    
Using contraception No 1733 (18.8) 7463 (81.0) 0.21 0.642
Yes 5 (0.1) 17 (0.2)    
Intention to use contraceptive No 347 (3.8) 1389 (15.1) 1.79 0.180
Yes 1391 (15.1) 6091 (66.1)    
Desire for future pregnancy Yes, have another 1645 (17.9) 6969 (75.6) 7.50 0.023
Undecided 80 (0.9) 468 (5.1)    
No, have no more 13 (0.1) 43 (0.5)    
Timing of future pregnancies Within 2 years 87 (0.9) 375 (4.1) 9.37 0.052
After 2 years 603 (6.5) 2431 (26.4)    
Unsure 955 (10.4) 4163 (45.2)    
Undecided 80 (0.9) 468 (5.1)    
No more 13 (0.1) 43 (0.5)    
Physical partner violence No 1118 (12.1) 5754 (62.4) 117.97 <0.001
Yes 620 (6.7) 1726 (18.7)    

Table 3 shows the results of the multivariate analysis. Participants in Sulawesi were more likely to terminate (adjusted odds ratio: 1.237, P=0.012), compared to those from other islands. Those with primary education (adjusted odds ratio: 1.719, P<0.001), a greater wealth index (adjusted odds ratio: 0.688, P<0.001), who lived in rural areas (adjusted odds ratio: 1.165, P=0.015) or who experienced physical partner violence (adjusted odds ratio: 1.576, P<0.001) were more likely to decide to terminate their unwanted pregnancy. Those who were undecided on whether or not they wanted another pregnancy in future were less likely to terminate (adjusted odds ratio: 0.613, P=0.005) than those who knew whether they did or did not want to become pregnant again.


Table 3. Multivariate analysis
Variable Category Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) P value
Region (island) Sumatera Reference -
Riau 1.140 (0.787–1.652) 0.489
Java 0.861 (0.739–1.002) 0.053
Bali and Nusa Tenggara 1.222 (0.999–1.493) 0.051
Kalimantan 1.192 (0.963–1.476) 0.106
Sulawesi 1.237 (1.048–1.460) 0.012
Maluku 1.149 (0.904–1.461) 0.255
Papua 1.002 (0.667–1.503) 0.994
Age (years) 15–19 Reference -
20–24 0.870 (0.749–1.010) 0.068
Education High Reference -
Secondary 1.297 (1.122–1.499) <0.001
Primary 1.719 (1.268–2.330) <0.001
None 0.512 (0.115–2.276) 0.379
Wealth index Poorest Reference -
Poorer 0.800 (0.674–0.948) 0.010
Middle 0.762 (0.638–0.911) 0.003
Richer 0.677 (0.562–0.816) <0.001
Richest 0.688 (0.567–0.835) <0.001
Residence Urban Reference -
Rural 1.165 (1.030–1.317) 0.015
Currently working No Reference -
Yes 1.029 (0.912–1.160) 0.645
Visiting health facility No Reference -
Yes 0.926 (0.816–1.050) 0.230
Sex of household head Man Reference -
Woman 0.928 (0.801–1.075) 0.321
Intention to use contraceptive No Reference -
Yes 1.211 (0.438–3.353) 0.712
Desire for future pregnancy Yes, have another Reference -
Undecided 0.613 (0.435–0.864) 0.005
No, have no more 0.981 (0.499–1.930) 0.956
Timing of future pregnancy Within 2 years Reference -
After 2 years 1.004 (0.778–1.295) 0.979
Unsure 0.921 (0.718–1.181) 0.517
Undecided Omitted -
No more Omitted -
Physical partner violence No Reference -
Yes 1.576 (1.402–1.772) <0.001

Discussion

This study analysed data from the Indonesian demographic and health survey of 2017 in order to assess factors related to the decision to terminate an unwanted pregnancy among women aged between 15 and 24 years old. Residence, education, wealth and experiencing physical partner violence were factors related to deciding to terminate.

Women's residence, in terms of which island in Indonesia they were from, influenced the decision to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Women who live in regions that are far from government centres, such as in Sulawesi, may be less likely to decide to terminate as a result of low information dissemination in these locations; regional factors affecting information distribution may mean women are not aware of the services available to allow them to safely terminate their pregnancy.

There are regional disparities in health status and the quality, availability and capacity of health services (Mahendradhata et al, 2017). The government has decentralised to increase the reach of health services, but there are still disparities. Additionally, local developments and culture need to be considered. Culturally, there is a behaviour known as lokika sangraha, where a man has sexual intercourse with a woman until she becomes pregnant and then does not marry her (Sarmita, 2015). Women who become pregnant as a result of this tend to hide, because of cultural perceptions of shame; the lack of openness and ability to seek assistance can make it harder for women to gather information and come to an informed decision regarding the pregnancy (Smith et al, 2016).

In Sulawesi, especially the south, women with an unwanted pregnancy or who become pregnant outside of marriage are traditionally isolated and often decide to terminate their pregnancy (Pramono, 2022). To avoid scandal, a woman may be married to an appointed man, who may or may not be the father of the child (Ubbe, 2005). This marriage can benefit the mother and child, because of the associated social status and by providing a father figure for the child, but may result in a lack of support from the partner. Customary law regarding unwanted or extramarital pregnancies has been implemented and can help reduce the burden of these pregnancies in terms of the associated cultural stigma; this law protects a pregnant woman's human rights and grants them the right to a legal marital status. This can help women avoid the social stigma of having a child while being unmarried, as well as protecting the rights of pregnant adolescent women, including their right to receive formal education. However, it is beneficial if a counsellor assists in the law's application.

Although, the present study's results reported that age was not associated with the decision to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, women who are older may be more likely to have greater autonomy and self-confidence. Previous research has reported that older women are more likely to participate in healthcare decisions (Acharya et al, 2010; Rizkianti et al, 2020), and knowledge of contraception and awareness of reproductive health tends to be greater in older women (Al-Rabee, 2003). In Indonesia, a person is considered to be an adult when they reach 21 years old; by law, they become capable of making legal decisions and being responsible for themselves (Dharma, 2015). Women who have more autonomy can participate in health decision making, such as the decision to visit a health facility (Nadeem et al, 2021) and pregnancy-related matters, including unwanted pregnancies (Rahman, 2012). However, women under 21 years old are not yet legally able to make their own decisions (Hanifa and Kurniawati, 2020). In Indonesia, younger women have less autonomy, and parents, friends and partners often have greater influence on these decisions (Ralph et al, 2014; Skosana et al, 2020). Others often take over decision making, including a woman's family or parents.

Women with higher education may have a greater understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of terminating or continuing a pregnancy. In the present study, women with lower education were more likely to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Formal education can foster educational empowerment (Nkhoma et al, 2020) and knowledge of health services for reproduction and family planning is greater in well-educated women (Tegegn et al, 2008; Ahmed and Hafez, 2014). With more knowledge, women may be more capable of and confident in making decisions on their pregnancy or fertility (Testa, 2014). In addition, women with higher education may be more able to provide for their children and access health services such as vaccinations (Kusnanto et al, 2020; Mediarti et al, 2020; Arifin et al, 2021), making them more likely to decide to continue with the pregnancy.

Women from rural areas were more likely to terminate their unwanted pregnancy. This may be related to education and knowledge on family planning; those living in urban areas typically have better education, knowledge, access to family planning programmes and contraception, and a better understanding of the consequence of termination (Sarder et al, 2021). Women who live in rural areas also often have a strong culture related to behaviour. Stigma that assumes that an unwanted pregnancy or pregnancy outside of marriage is bad may mean women experiencing this stigma prefer to abort their pregnancy.

Women from a lower wealth index may find it more difficult to make a decision regarding an unwanted pregnancy. Women with lower economic status were more likely to terminate the pregnancy in the present study compared to those with high economic status. Several studies have reported a similar association (Sopiatun, 2011; Dehlendorf et al, 2013). This decision may be based on avoiding the negative consequences of having more dependents in a household (Kiranantika, 2013). Women from a higher wealth index may have more resources and are more able to meet the needs of their children.

Women who are undecided on fertility preferences were less likely to terminate their pregnancy. A previous study showed that women with a low psychological burden found it easier to make decisions related to pregnancy than those who were uncertain (Murugesu et al, 2021). Women who plan to have more children are more likely to accept their pregnancy and continue with it, even if it was unplanned (Zeleke et al, 2021).

Women who experienced physical violence were more likely to terminate their unwanted pregnancies. In the present study, most domestic violence was the result of the reaction to a participant going out without telling their partner. Domestic violence is a serious issue that can affect physical and psychological conditions (Sharma et al, 2019; Newnham et al, 2022), and previous studies have shown that unwanted pregnancies increase the likelihood of domestic violence (Acharya et al, 2019; Sharman et al, 2019). Physical violence can occur alongside fertility control in the form of contraceptive sabotage, pregnancy pressure or forced pregnancy, and this can influence a woman's decision about their pregnancy (Moore et al, 2010; Silverman and Raj, 2014). Violence by those closest to them also increases the likelihood of a woman experiencing an unwanted pregnancy and abortion (Maxwell et al, 2017). Parents usually take over decision making regarding a woman's pregnancy when there is no available counselling process, because an unwanted pregnancy is viewed negatively in this cultural context (Mulyanti, 2017). For women with an unwanted pregnancy, counselling and the assurance that those closest to them will not commit violence or stigmatise the woman provide support for managing an unwanted pregnancy and may influence the decision to continue.

Conclusions

Participants' residence, education, wealth index and experience of physical partner violence affected the decision to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Those who were undecided on whether or not they wanted another pregnancy in future were less likely to terminate than those who knew whether they did or did not want to become pregnant again. Government and health workers should formulate policies related to unwanted pregnancy, taking these factors into account. Health education and interventions such as counselling should be made available to ensure women are able to make an informed decision about their pregnancy, avoiding the influence of stigmatisation or economic burdens.

Key points

  • The decision to terminate an unwanted pregnancy among women in Indonesia is taken by almost 20% of this population, and 25% of these suffer physical partner violence.
  • The present study analysed data from the Indonesian demographic and health survey of 2017.
  • Respondents' residence, education, preference for future pregnancies and experience of physical partner violence influenced their decision to terminate their unwanted pregnancy.
  • Cross–collaboration between the government, healthcare workers and parents to educate and empower women with an unwanted pregnancy should be initiated.

CPD reflective questions

  • In the case of an unwanted pregnancy, how can midwives support young women in their decision making?
  • What strategic programmes can be implemented to prevent unwanted pregnancies?
  • What counselling can be given to assist women to make a decision regarding an unwanted pregnancy